Tuesday, December 21, 2010

“Do vintage, but don't cut corners”

“Do vintage, but don't cut corners”


Do vintage, but don't cut corners

Posted: 12 Dec 2010 02:17 AM PST

NEW YORK -- There's something romantic about the idea of a vintage wed­ding dress, with the wonder­ful stories it could tell. May­be there'd be some delicate lace, too, or exquisite siren-worthy satin.

Reality, though, isn't al­ways so pretty.

Some vintage dresses are those perfect gowns you dream of, said Mark Ingram, CEO and creative director of Manhattan's Mark Ingram Bridal Atelier, but others are too costume-y, too dated or, more likely, simply ill-fit­ting.

"You can reach back to some vintage eras and look as contemporary as buying a new dress. But," he said, "you have to consider your figure first and foremost. If the dress isn't flattering to your figure type, just don't go down the road."

Cameron Silver, owner of the Los Angeles couture vin­tage shop Decades, suggests these questions to ask -- frankly -- of yourself:

Do you need to wear a bra? Do you have a boyish figure? An hourglass shape? What about your hips? All of these, he said, are factors in buying any wedding gown, but particularly those meant to fit women of previous generations.

Silver, a resource for Hol­lywood red-carpet looks, also warns that finding a pristine white vintage dress can be hard, and that a good vintage dress, if it's not an heirloom, can be more ex­pensive than you'd think. Even with your grandmoth­er's dress, there could be pricey alterations.

"Don't do this because you think it's the easy way out, or that it'll be cheaper," adds Ingram. "You have to want it -- you have to want to have this look."

But if you do find that ideal gown from yesteryear, Silver said, it's a magical moment. He once sold a full Chantilly lace wedding gown by Chanel. "It was such a thrill," he said.

There was a more recent Olivier Theyskens for Ro­chas gown that practically brought tears to his eyes.

(If you find a keeper, be ready to buy it right away -- no wavering -- because there's not another one stuck in some inventory closet.)

If you're partial to embroi­dery, look at gowns from the 1920s-'30s, while sultry, sat­in gowns come out of the '40s. Women with a full bust might look to the curvier '50s silhouette, said Ingram, WE TV's "gown guru," while mini-dresses of the '60s are cool, yet hard to pull off un­less the event is casual or the bride prides herself an indi­vidualist.

(2 of 2)

Silver said that's usually the case with those who wear vintage. "This bride doesn't want to look like ev­eryone else."

Still, you can hit contem­porary fashion trends. Something from the '70s, a little bohemian but sexy, too, is probably the hippest look going.

The period to stay away from is, no surprise, the '80s, with its oversize pouffy shoulders and tapered sleeves. "Right now, the '80s looks so dated. Yes, 20-30 years back is 'vintage,' but if you're going back, that's a bad period to dip into. No 'Dynasty,' not even Princess Diana," Ingram says. "There could be a big trend back to the '80s if Kate (Middleton) wore it, but I can't imagine that. It's too big. The propor­tion was too big, and it wouldn't look modern now."

A bride's goal often is a timeless look, since the pho­tos will hopefully last a life­time, but each era still has its signature, said Michael Shettel, designer of bridal brand Alfred Angelo. You might be best off with a clas­sic silhouette, while adjust­ing embellishments and de­tails to current tastes, he suggests.

Wedding-gown trends don't swing as quickly as ready-to-wear fashion, he ex­plains: Of course, white al­ways dominates the market and the overall vibe is fancy, but when you line them up, you'll see differences in the size and types of pearls and beads, changes in popular lace patterns, hemlines going up and down.

"You want to make it your own, while still honoring whoever wore a vintage dress before. ... Maybe you'd like to make it a little more low-cut, a little more fitted, maybe give it a fuller skirt," Shettel said.

He also borrows from the past for new gowns. The tight-bodice, tea-length ball­gown, which "Mad Men" helped bring back in style, seems very fresh, Shettel said, and the asymmetrical neckline remains popular.

Ingram said the best of both worlds might be vin­tage or vintage-inspired ac­cessories on a new dress. "Add a fur piece -- a shrug or a stole -- and it looks vin­tage, even if it's new, which probably means a better fit. The look could be 1910 or 2010," he said.

He also likes to add a bead­ed belt or sash, which also can give the illusion of a small waist, and carries that retro feel.

There's no reason, though, to go back in time for your beauty routine.

"If you do a vintage wed­ding dress, your accessories, hair and makeup have to be incredibly modern," said Decades' Silver. "You don't want to be the bride of Frankenstein. If the dress looks 'period,' you have to play against it in your styl­ing -- unless you have a Ren­aissance theme, and who does that?"

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.

0 comments:

Post a Comment